Sunday, December 23, 2007

Traditional Leaders as Father Figures

We believe of leading in many different ways, which is why it is so confusing. At one degree we speak about leading a tour. We follow circuit ushers when they "lead" us around an ancient monument. Similarly, we mention to "leading a discussion." Here, we are really talking about conducting rather than prima as we believe of it in organizations.

A 2nd popular conception is that of being the top individual in a group, the individual who wins in getting to the top through military unit of personality or election. Being such as a leader can intend having the ability to transfuse assurance that you will pull off the group's personal business in a responsible manner, that you will be a good steward or caretaker.

A 3rd manner of defining leading is to concentrate on showing the way, promoting new directions. Althoujgh we normally associate this conception of it with being in complaint of the team, there is no necessary connexion here. It is quite possible to take in this sense without being in complaint of followers. Market prima concerns and conference leading athletics squads take their rivals without managing them. St Martin Martin Luther King had an impact on the U.S, authorities when the Supreme Court ruled segregation on buses unconstitutional thanks to his presentations and speeches. Clearly, King was not in complaint of the Supreme Court. Finally, whenever a front-line cognition worker advances a new merchandise or better process, leading is shown to senior executive directors who are not managed by this employee.

Paternalistic Leadership

There is another manner of talking about leading that doesn't often acquire discussed and that is leadership as father figures. Many people desire person in complaint of their organization, club, community or state who they can look up to, who can comfort their anxiousnesses and supply them with reassurance. Rudolf Giuliani occupied this function followers 9-11. Being a father figure plant well adequate in relatively stable, low technical school states of affairs like state baseball clubs and charitable organisations but it is unsafe in concerns that vie through changeless innovation. The job is that it is inherently disempowering. When we halt hearing to our existent fathers and electric switch our commitment to our boss, we run the hazard of idealizing this new father figure. This is a no-win situation: we so strongly anticipate such as leading to walk on H2O that they can't assist but let down us.

Paternal leadership is not totally dysfunctional, however. We desire to delight our fathers and we therefore drive ourselves to dwell up to their expectations. This theoretical account plant well adequate when the cardinal undertaking is efficient execution. But where invention is critical for success, we necessitate employees who believe for themselves, who make not look up to senior executive directors too respectfully.

Within the paternalistic framework, we unwittingly delegate the good cat function to leadership making directors the bad guys. We desire our leadership to be sensitive, supportive and inspiring, while we see directors as controlling and punitive. This division of labour enables us to continue our idealised mental image of them because we can simply price reduction bad leadership as managers. This is a defensive reaction that assists us continue the position quo but the downside is that we avoid facing world in order to keep our phantasy of the good father figure.

Thought Leadership

The 3rd theoretical account of leading mentioned above tin be called thought leadership. In cognition driven organizations, all employees who advance a better manner are showing leadership. In this context, senior executive directors necessitate to run more than as facilitators, accelerators and endowment nurturers than as leaders. Their function is like that of investors. They do determinations about which of the enterprises bubbling up from below are most worthy of investment.

This is not about fillet ourselves from learning from father figs or other function models. The cardinal point is that regarding such as figs as leading can acquire in the manner of everyone else in the organisation screening leadership themselves. Dependence is never healthy, but it is especially hazardous and dearly-won where organisations necessitate everyone thought for themselves to be successful.

Labels: , , , ,


Post a Comment

<< Home